Wisconsin Investigative Services

A full service investigative agency for attorneys, corporations, insurance firms and private citizens throughout the State of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Investigative Services header image 1

Merry Christmas

December 19th, 2008 · No Comments

With 2008 nearly over and the last of the holidays fast approaching, we at W.I.S. would like to wish everyone a very Merry Christmas and happy New Year. 

Stay safe and enjoy the holidays.

Rick

→ No CommentsTags: Blog

The Myth of Private Investigators

September 24th, 2008 · 1 Comment

I knew several Private Investigators when I was a police officer. For the most part they were a good group of guys (at the time women were the smallest of minorities), but spent most of their time serving summons and complaints rather than conducting investigations. Why I don’t know. They weren’t complaining and at the time it wasn‘t something that kept me awake at night.

But now that I’ve retired and become a Private Investigator I find it curious how the cycle has come full turn. I’m faced with the same predicament as that group of guys.

I’ve given it a lot of thought to why and I think I’ve come up with a reasonable explanation, though its not one I agree with at all. There is a stigma to the business and it’s been inherent since Hollywood decided to make movies about PIs.

Bob Sassone did a blog about famous television PIs and if I were to choose my favorite silver screen heroes, it would have to be Tom Selleck’s Magnum PI and Robert Urich’s Spencer. Whoever dreamed them up must have been a cop or closely tied to law enforcement. Their personalities and loose connection to law enforcement is as close as you can get to the real world without stepping in it.

There are others like Angela Lansbury’s Jessica Fletcher (I always like how she managed to wrap up everything after the last commercial), Edward Woodward’s The Equalizer and of course Jeremy Betts Sherlock Holmes who were just as entertaining but not nearly as realistic. Hollywood went a bit over the top trying to outdo reality.

But if Hollywood went overboard with the latter, then they went crazy with Stacy Keach’s Mike Hammer. Seedy, often drunk and willing to break any rule to get what he wanted, this rule-breaking oddball PI is not who we are though his persona has become the most widely accepted view of our industry.

I have no proof to support this contention, but it seems clear more than just a few holds this perception. I have seen the quickly veiled grimaces, the eye rolls and innocent innuendos whenever I introduced myself as a PI. I chuckle like everyone else and give him or her the old, wink-wink-that-was-a good-joke smile when someone asks if its fun playing Mike Hammer. Then out of defense more than anything I tell them I’m a retired police officer who enjoys the work, hoping they‘ll get the hint.

For me, there’s not much difference between being a cop and being a PI. One is pretty much the same as the other when it comes to investigations. Education being equal, the only real difference is one has the authority of law and even that doesn’t tilt the outcome in favor of one over the other. It’s the experience and dedication of the person doing the investigations who will make the difference, and not how much you can drink, carouse, or thump someone’s noggin, ala Mikey boy.

So, what do you think? I’d like to hear your opinions. Do you perceive PIs as mini Mike Hammers who slink around dark alleys looking for criminals to jump out of the shadows or something more professional like Magnum, Spencer and retired cops?

Looking forward to your comments,

Rick

→ 1 CommentTags: Blog

Revisiting Public Defender Cases

June 23rd, 2008 · No Comments

I’ve gotten a few phonecalls regarding this article, so I decided to re-post it for those who may have missed it. Enjoy and feel free to leave a comment.

I enjoy investigating. I don’t know why, I just do. Maybe its an innate curiosity that drives me to question everything or all those years being a cop that has trained my mind to look at things differently. Who knows? But I enjoy it nonetheless.

I’ve thought about that “why” for a while and after thirty-some years, have finally come up with two reasonable explanations. The first is an axiom of law; it is better to let a hundred guilty men go free than to send one innocent man to jail. The other is based in the rules of evidence; let the evidence guide you, it does not lie.

So how does this relate to being an investigator and State Public Defender cases? Good question. The answer is simple. Not everyone charged with a crime, accused of wrongdoing or looked upon with disdain by his fellow peers is guilty. Some in fact may even be victims, unwittingly manipulated by zealots willing to trample rights to make their cases.

Unfortunately, for the indigent it can even get worse and that is patently wrong. Being poor is no reason to suffer such atrocities. Every person deserves his day in court and I for one believe that wholeheartedly. That is why I take SPD cases. I want to help. Yet after reviewing several state and national alliances for investigators I see very few willing to take them and I have to ask why?

So my question for the blog is this: Is there a reason other than money why so few investigators are willing to take SPDs cases?

→ No CommentsTags: Blog